Scanned, recopied or Internet copy, if there are errors, please e-mail me with corrections: Opening comments: More at the end. Toronto Sun - Feb. 19, 2010 - By Ted Woloshyn - ted.woloshyn@sunmedia.ca - Controversies galore in Mississauga's McCallion inquiry By a unanimous vote — something that’s as rare in Mississauga as a crowded transit bus — council has agreed to pay the legal costs of both Mayor Hazel McCallion and her son Peter, each up to $100,000. That’s just one of the controversies rolling around as the judicial inquiry into the city’s acquisition of about 8.5 acres of land worth almost $15 million in a development deal that involved her son and led to questions about a potential conflict of interest for the mayor nears. Council opening their wallets to the McCallion family — it’s groundbreaking for, Peter, a third party not related to the city, to be funded by taxpayers — has raised the ire of some Mississaugans. Peter McCallion still has to prove he does not have the financial wherewithal to pay the bills himself, a fact assumed by most. Still, even Coun. Carolyn Parrish, the mayor’s prime adversary, was in favour. “I have no problem with that,” Parrish said in the Mississauga News. “She’s obviously not being accused of anything and I don’t think she’s the focus of the hearing.” She actually said that without piercing the skin of her cheek with her tongue. The third party requesting financial assistance was OMERS, the mammoth municipal pension plan. Parrish wasn’t so warm and fuzzy with that concept. “OMERS, I wouldn’t give them one damn cent. They don’t fit the criteria,” she said. OMERS bid rejected The criteria being they can afford to take care of themselves. OMERS bid for funding was rejected. What is disturbing the citizens is why taxpayers are covering the mayor and her son, when no one pays their legal costs? Quite simply no one involved in this inquiry has been charged with any crime. It’s not a criminal trial, but rather a judicial investigation, and at the end of the inquiry there will be no guilty or not guilty verdict handed out; just some red faces and perhaps damaged reputations. So couldn’t you make an argument that because it’s not a legal trial and because the inquiry comes at the behest of council, if you cover one person’s costs the same rules should apply for all who’ve been asked to participate? Legal counsel for OMERS suggests the money spent on their defence in fact belongs to their members. Coun. Katie Mahoney believes if the city paid, “It would be taxpayers’ money, and I represent the interests of the taxpayer.” The wicked irony, or even conflict, as some suggest, is all of Mississauaga’s councillors have a share in the OMERS pension plan. Billing overseen Justice Douglas Cunningham, who will preside over the inquiry, has appointed a well respected and veteran solicitor to oversee the legal disbursements. Those will be regulated by specific criteria such as limiting legal counsel to attending hearings when their clients’ interests are engaged and not otherwise. In other words, no hanging around looking for extra billing time. Their hourly rate will vary from $75 for articling students to $325 per hour for counsel with 20-plus years experience. The lawyer charged with this task is William Woloshyn, whose name caused Coun. Parrish to ask, “Is he related to Ted Woloshyn?” Just a little paranoid aren’t you Carolyn? The answer is no, we are not related, and you’re being more than a little rude in suggesting it would matter to a man with an impeccable reputation in the legal community. And by the way, the other day Joseph Estate Winery introduced the Hazel Heritage Wine which will support her Arts Foundation. Funny, but when I think w(h)ine, I usually think of Carolyn. Comments by others, 17, to this web-page; Mississauga Conservative Report Comment The fact is, Parrish arranged for this little witch hunt at the expense of taxpayers. So, why should Hazel, her son, or anyone REQUIRED to participate have to pay their own legal costs ? They didn't ask for this, Parrish and her band of followers did. To Parrish and her ilk. We know who you are. Come next election, you can count on us making your campaigns HELL. We'll be at EVERY function you appear at asking you embarrassing questions in front of the media and citizens. You better make sure ALL of your skeletions are out before cause we are actively looking for them . You will NOT be re-elected after we get through with you. Next, Liberals MPP's. The Ram Report Comment Guffaw!!!! Guffaw!!!!! That would be the "FATHERLAND", Reichsfeuhrer. . But then I Guess you REALISE that Our Beloved Mayor (HAZEL) DOES HAVE BRASS BALL$$$. . . I bet you'd say the same of the Esteemed, Honourable and Illustrious "Golda Meir", "Magaret Thatcher" and "Indira Gandhi" - the Three IRON LADIES of the TWENTIETH CENTURY - ??? Re. your RFP, on CAROLYN PARIAH: -----Quote---EVIDENCE PLEASE!----UnQuote---- A Pig's Curly Tail, can NEVER be made STRAIGHT, permanently. . . AND The "GODFATHER 11" Likening is called an Analogy, Mein Herr. . . Zoe Report Comment Oh, and the statement that Ms. Parrish seems to keep using "it's not about the mayor" MISSISSAUGAWATCH Report Comment Sincerest apologies to Sun readers regarding my previous posting. Hmmm... I wonder what politician's Twitter account I can grab.... :-) MISSISSAUGAWATCH Report Comment EVIDENCE PLEASE! "Obviously Carolyn in the City watched THE GODFATHER (PART 11), recently; wherein MICHAEL CORLEONE explains the Old Don's Wisdom of "Doing Business" N Maintaning a "Facade of Amiability", with Hyman Roth, to a Member of His "Extended Family"; viz: Keep your Friends Close and Your Enemies Closer. . . ." Ms. P' probably Hopes after her "Smoke Screen" has Settled, Our Beloved Hurrican may decide to Expend her Force, elsewhere; in which case, "She" may decide NOT to NOMINATE Someone and OPPOSE CP's Lust for Power and HINDER her JOUSTING during her Quest for the Holy Grail (a.k.a. Mayor). EVIDENCE PLEASE! MISSISSAUGAWATCH Report Comment You wrote: "Have you heard of the Term "Alias" - a.k.a. Pseudonym - a.k.a. Nom de Guerre - ?? Have to give whoever's using HAZELMCCALLION" Twitter that they really got me! You wrote "Maybe being the TWIT(Y)E R, U assume, we would SWALLOW any DRIVEL, U Dish Out. Do U Believe The "REAL HAZEL" would Do That????" YES! Absolutely! That's the POINT! Hazel McCallion not only believes that she's Above the Law, she IS Above the Law! And few people have researched her like I have. Again. She IS Above the Law. You wrote, "Sadly, it appears you are Nothing More than an AGENT PROVOCATEUR" HAZEL UBER ALLES Dude! Bob Report Comment The Ram Report Comment Have you heard of the Term "Alias" - a.k.a. Pseudonym - a.k.a. Nom de Guerre - ?? Maybe being the TWIT(Y)E R, U assume, we would SWALLOW any DRIVEL, U Dish Out. Do U Believe The "REAL HAZEL" would Do That???? Sadly, it appears you are Nothing More than an AGENT PROVOCATEUR. . . . Just so people know. Hazel McCallion wrote this on Twitter: Never mind the Red Cross please donate to my son's legal fund. Some real estate moguls are really feeling the pinch. http://bit.ly/crTT3P 7:20 PM Feb 15th from web The ram Report Comment Manuel B Report Comment wanda Report Comment And to Mr. Ted.. you are great Hazel, retire already Report Comment Miffed in Miss. Report Comment paul Report Comment It's getting hazzy with Hazel Report Comment
Home Page - Main Table of Contents - Back up a page - Back to Top [COMMENTS BY DON B. - ] |
Your Financial Donations are Greatly Appreciated The • |