• Home • Table of Contents • General News •

YouTube  site
where my videos are posted

Pages  of  Special  Interest;

In Defence of Canadians Rights & Democracy

* Hazel McCallion - Mayor of Mississauga *
- 2009 -
* Conflict of Interest & Judicial Inquiry *

* Public Question Period Index *
!! A Mississauga Democratic Tradition Lost !!

• Defense Fund for Donald Barber •

• Sound Clip Gallery • Video Clip Gallery •

• Byron Osmond Pleas for Mercy • Peel police Wrong Doings •

• Hazel McCallion - Mayor of Mississauga - her Misdeeds • The Culham Brief •

• Order of Canada & its Corruption •

• End of Suburbia & Continuous Communities as the Solution - JOBS FOR LIFE •

Other  Table  of  Contents;
• Events • Archive of Links •
• Media - News Articles & Letters to Media • Literature & News Letters •

• Elections Results in Mississauga • Political History of Mississauga • Political, Democratic & Legal Issues •

• Political Methods • The Meaning of Words & Phrases • Political Satire & Parody •
• City Mississauga Committees • City Mississauga By-Laws & Policies •
• Security Insanity • Police Issues, Complaints & News Articles •
• FOI - Freedom of Information Results & Issues •
• Legal Issues • Unions Issues •

• Political Players & Persons of Interest • Ratepayers Groups & their Issues in Mississauga •

Comments on the City of Mississauga's
This is the Long & draft version
Short version

main page

The first Vandalism and Violence in Mississauga's City Facilities, Policy - This is the newer version.

Alarm - Our Democratic, human rights and freedoms, ending in our life time.

By Donald Barber.

The biggest issue in the Mississauga 2000 election is a new "policy" that sets up a new legal system in the City with a set of laws designed to be abused.  They turn our parks into concentration camps.  A new City of Mississauga policy "Vandalism and Violence (V&V), in City Facilities" shows City of Mississauga politicians have turned away from the path of democracy, human rights and freedoms and has put us on notice: Don't disagree with the City.  The country I was proud of, is disappearing one law at a time.

The V&V policy has set a new and dangerous standard of government control over people's lives and control by fear in the community.  It has created a City-run legal system, with new laws, and turned City staff into a police force, with unprecedented authority over us.  We are told that V&V was created to deal with sports violence but it goes far beyond the sports field and fair play.  In fact, this policy is so extreme it can be called fascist and an act of violence against the community.  It can be shown City staff and their decision are controlled by their political masters (such as signing false affidavits and generally saying whatever gets the job done), so this new legal system would be under political control, in fact it is a political weapon.  Who is enforcing it, is more important then what the laws are.  The City of Mississauga and Hazel McCallion, our Mayor, appears to be alone in leading this anti-democratic charge, I see no reference to other cities undertaking this third world method but you can bet if the City of Mississauga gets away with it, they will follow.

V&V covers all City facilities (including non-sports buildings like City Hall), all City property (like parks).  V&V defines acts of violence as "but is not limited to ", "loud verbal assaults;", "attempts to intimidate;" and "attempts to goad", to name a few.  According to staff (I have consulted with them), a threatening tone can be considered a violent act as well.  As it imposes harsh penalties for even attempts to intimidate it means Canadians must become meek and submissive toward City politicians and staff.  The legal standard is so low that if your children claimed these things were happening, you would tell them to grow up and in the courts they would laugh you out.  It is highly questionable that V & V conforms to our Provincial and Federal laws, such as the charter of rights.  It appears V&V is in contravention of the criminal code and does not properly conform to existing law.  If so they don't respect the law and City is as dangerous as the criminals, they claim to be saving us from.

One of the first things the Nazis's did when taking power, was to make it illegal to disagree with the government, by changing the laws and legal system.

This policy imposes "ZERO TOLERANCE" (ZT), or an extreme political solution on us.  ZT, caters to the right wing holier then thou extremists, who are blood thirsty for human sacrifices (of other people), on the alter of law and order.  Remember how ZT was used in the 1930's, what the effects were and the cost to defeat it?  Those errors are being repeated.  Democracy is about erring on the side of caution.

Phoney public input.
Created with no public meetings and no input from the majority of Mississaugans who use City facilities.  Consultation was mostly with sport groups.  Taxpayers are not invited to participant in forming the policies that will control them, why, don't we pay enough taxes?

The City has misled taxpayers about the nature of its actions.  This policy is not about extreme sport violence, that is the smoke screen for a political power grab and they are trying to hide it from taxpayers.  A personal request from myself, in City Council, for the City to post notice of this policy in the newspaper, so Mississaugans would be aware of it and I was refused.  The City wants us to blindly trust them and that they will be just.  Apart from the fact there is an abundance of examples to should City Hall has a passing acquaintance with the law, let us not forget, the role of the public is to demand nothing less then the highest level of justice for all, not political promises.

A couple of thoughts - You can't let other people lose their human rights and expect to have yours.  You can't live in a country with the laws of a dictatorship and expect to have human rights and freedom or a democracy.

Who does this new legal system really target?
This policy is a legal sledge hammer designed to go after selected Mississaugans who disagree with our politicians and City Hall.  That is the reason for the low legal standard, not sports.  It is for making City facilities safe for unpopular politicians.  The victims are those who don't have the City's huge legal resources (your tax dollars at work), to fight back with and the legally inexperienced (most Mississaugans).  Sadly in Canada if you can't afford to pay for lawyers, you can't afford to buy justice and the law simple doesn't exist for you.  It is for the targeting of community leaders such as myself who accrete our right as Canadians to play a meaningful role in the decision making that affect our communities.  Who will not go away told to and can take the abuses our politicians dish out.  The control of City meetings where outraged taxpayers confront politicians, is the more likely reason for this policy.  As our Mayor Hazel McCallion doesn't have the strength to deal with the people she has upset and she does not wish to suffer Mississaugans publicly disagree with her, so the rules of the game are changed.  City Hall likes to deal only with certain people (those who agree and often for personal gain with the City), and the rest of us (real human beings), must learn to know our place, no peasant revolution allowed in Hazel's kingdom.

Procedures and costs to implement this policy.
Many details of this policy were not presented to Council, such as the exact legal procedures and costs, why?  Was it to give City staff a blank cheque?  Remember the devil is in the details.  Looking at the new laws and you can see that to enforce them fairly and equally across the City would cost a fortune and the City is not going to do that.  Instead, only the selected individuals who disagree with the City, will be targeted.

This legal process with have some kind of review committee, I asked how it will work and staff didn't know but will include a police officer.  Others on this committee are sport league representatives, principals and City staff.  They say it will be composed of persons appropriate to review the matter but how a sport league or principals are going to handle a political/ratepayer matter is beyond me.  The committee will look over staff reports and could pass on its recommendation on to a City Commissioner for a decision.  If this committee feels the matter is clear cut enough the accused will not even be asked to make a submission in their own defence!  An appeal will cost $250 just to file!  Not only is this system cost prohibitive but there a serious questions about the so-called justice it will dish out.

* If a community activist is bared from City Hall and that person needs the
    services that  are only availability there how will the City provide them?

* The City doesn't feel inclined to submit the reports that staff writes about
    people, so they can make comments or make corrections.  You will find
    out what is written about you when it is to their advantage to do so.

* The City accuses you and is the judge, how fair is that?

* To what degree do you have to prove your innocence, in this new legal system?

* What will protect the rights of the accused?

* Likely you will not be allowed to face your accuser, so much easily to make
    self serving false accusations.

* What will the rules of evidence be?

* Will the City create a manual for the accused to guide them through the
    Cities new legal system?

* Will the City act responsibility and make public past decisions (without
   peoples names) and legal precedence it has set in its legal system?

* It sounds like a trial in secret will be held, the accused not even allowed to
   be present at their trial, is that the way we want our society to go?

* From the sounds of it, the accused is not likely to get full disclosure of the
   facts, accusations, reports etc., before review and trial.
   Sound medieval in nature, yes?

* As City staff are in the City's pay and control, would they not have a basis
   and a desire to aid politicians for personal gain?  How can they truly be
   impartial can they be?

* There appears to be no way to make or subpoena people to appear and
   testify, a key element in finding justice.

* In a politically controlled kangaroo court, the slanderous outcome may not
    be officially reported but it will be spread, in fact staff may stage a scene in
    front of selected group of people to ensure it is widely commutated.  After
    all going to all this trouble creating a weapon and not using it is not like
    Hazel.  The nature of politics is to defame and slander your opponents,
   while claiming you had nothing to do with it.  Hoping people will not ask why
   Hazel spent years building walls, rather then bridges to resolve the
   conflicts surrounding this issue.

Comments about the judge and the review committee.
The City of Mississauga is famous for creating committees and then stacking them with rubber stamp persons who are more motivated by personal gain then severing the community or justice.  Would not sports groups have a vested interest in siding with the City to get favors for their members at the expense of the community.  One of the greatest concerns the public should have is what was noted to me by City staff.  That it is likely Peel police will be supplying their records regarding persons accused by the City's to members of the public sitting on the review committee.  Who are untrained as to know how to properly use these records or understand them in making judgements and no reasonable guarantee they will not simply communicate confidential records in the form of slanderous gossip to the public at large.
That and other serious questions are.

* Why does the City really want to set up its own court system and laws?

* Why should we believe City staff are better cops or judges then those in
   the court system?  Maybe the real reason the City is not satisfied with over
   130 years of highly regarded common law is that Mississauga's politicians
    do not control it for their own ends!

* How to challenge or remove persons on the committee not appropriate for
   a given matter committee?

* If the City is not going to require special training for judges and members of
   its review committee, how can they say there will be a an acceptable level of justice?

Punishments and vandalism.
Includes being banned from City property for years and fines up to twice what the City says it costs for repairs, plus 10% (overhead).  Apparently, only the City will be allowed to determine costs.  As this policy is setup to force the public to pay for acts of vandalism it is likely the City will pressure staff to assign blame, so the City will not have to pay for repairs or even upgrades.  A little damage, some kind of staging and creative writing can go a long way to replacing already damaged or old equipment.  The City knows that banning persons who are actively standing up for the community and disagreeing with the City will greatly limit their effectiveness.  And what is there really to stop City staff or friends of politicians from making false accusations?

The City say this policy and laws are not a legal system but its outcomes will be posted with the police for enforcement, that sounds like a legal system to me and so do fines, sent to collection agencies if you don't pay.

Bullies and abuses.
This policy taken with other City by-laws and actions is very dangerous to us all.  It is open to abuse by bullies willing to falsely accuse the innocent through the facility watch program or to/by City staff.  The placing of video cameras all over City property treats everyone like criminals, all the time. When we read about how big bother controlled peoples lives with video cameras every where, you reacted with horror but when it slowly happens to us it appears acceptable, why?  Is this double think?

Not only is the legal standard for an offence ridiculously low, that can be easily interpreted to cover just about anything people do as human beings.  It can also be the foundation for even more law and order without justice.   We have just lost our freedom to act like human beings, to even get upset!  Throughout history dictators had delivered law and order but no justice.  This policy is a frivolous & vexatious law, that can easily be laid on anyone, after all what physical evidence would exist from "attempts to intimidate;"?
I asked staff how loud is loud verbal assault?  They do not know.  They also confirmed the City has not studied the possible abuses of it's new policy/legal system.

It is a well known fact that giving people the power to cause harm to other people by making accusations will result in many just lying to do so.  To empower bullies so that they can simply call others, a witch, a jew, a communist, a criminal, on welfare or whatever group is being cleansed, is the greatest mistake history has to show us and we are repeating it.  The question of how easy will it be for bullies to damage City property and blame others and/or make false accusations of violence toward other members of the public should be a very serious concern for the City.  Why is it not?

* What happens if the effort by the bully to goal is successful and victim
   fights back, who is thrown out?

Can the public fight back, against City staff?
It is very hard, the word of staff is law.  It is in the best interests for politicians to back up staff, so staff will back up politicians when they get into a jam and how do you prove intimidation?  Believe it or not the City of Mississauga has no complaint policy for taxpayers to file complaint regarding City staff, shows where City Halls priorities are.  The police have a complaints procedure to keep try and keep them accountable but not City staff.  Also the staff member who wrote this policy would not answer all my questions and hung up on me telling me to go to Clerks Dept. for my answers.  Of course there are no answers in the Clerks Dept., that is why I was sent there.

What does this policy really do to our communities?
It promotes the very violence it claims to be stoping and this intimidating policy is an act of violence against our communities.

The City claims to be creating a safe environment on its property, but in fact it is doing the opposite.  Bullies (liars), will love this.  They are not controlled by more laws; in fact it only gives them more power, the law is their weapon and words the ammunition.  People on City property will end up being ordered around by those who are willing to bully and lie.

How can parents feel safe sending their kids to a City park knowing a loud voice is an act of violence and their children can be convicted by the City of "throwing of articles in a deliberate or aggressive manner"?  That your children can be victims of a few bullies who gang up on your child, lie about who caused an act of vandalism.  Then you are forced to pay for an act of vandalism they didn't not commit.  And that your children can be falsely accused by bullies who working toward the banning of your children from City parks.  How can you enjoy Mississauga's parks knowing throwing a football or Frisbee is now a violent act. This policy is unenforceable in a fair and reasonable fashion.  This policy has been imposed on us just before an election and we have not had time to feel its effects or even know about it, smart on the City's part, yes?

Does it improve sports?  What is its effect on sports?
To fully obey this new City policy the sports it tries to control will have to be complete changed to make them legal.  You can't have sport events using existing rules for the games and still obey the City's new policy for playing sports.  Would your children even want to involved in sports with the City's rules for politically correct hockey?  A game without contact, players and parents gagged and don't keep scores as that would excite people. This policy also forces parents to sign forms saying they will not commit violent acts, this is treating them all like criminals.  In Canada people are innocent till proven guilty but alas not in Hazel land.  Interesting City staff don't have to sign anything saying the same or that they will not abuse their new found power.  As this policy is extreme in its definition of violence, kids will be ruled by fear and how can they enjoying the game preoccupied with the fear of doing something that an other person could call an act of violence?

What is strange, is the sports groups are going along with rules that would require they own game rules to be changed to use City Facilities and why has the City stepped into take over what should be a sports league problem.  Maybe a deal has been worked out in a back room, to explain their going along with this power grab.  But isn't odd that months after the events claimed to be the reason for this policy, the Mayor who is know for being a physical if not violent, rock'em, sock'em, hockey player, suddenly directs City staff to create a policy that makes hurt feelings an act of violence, don't you think?  How could a true Canadian do this to hockey?  By the way the City is planning to bring forward its Master plan for the Cawthra Bush (my main involvement with the City), to the public in a few months.  Guess Hazel and the Ward 1 Councillor are thinking it would be nice if they could remove me from the picture.

Human life and hockey are very much the same, there is some contact, feelings get hurt and it gets rough but that is what makes it great.  Have you ever heard of a coach stoping the game and complaining to the referee that a player had just been intimidated by the other team.  That a players feelings have been hurt and that is a violent act and the offending player should thrown off the property?  How would you regard that coach?  Most would call the coach a cry baby, comment that the coach should act like an mature adult and lose all respect for the coach.  But when the City does it, some how it is a great idea.  Lets not forget how these rules can used by one team to try and eliminate the other teams star players!

These rules are so bad they try to denature human beings and turn us into petty political creatures.

The V&V policy creates a double standards and allows City staff to refuse service to the public.

As this policy is imposed on taxpayers by City staff/politicians and they are except from its rules, the door is open to great abuse and bullying.  The City Manager has confirmed our worse fears, that City staff need only say they felt a little intimidated to refuse severing the taxpayers in a professional fashion.  How easy it is for City staff to say they didn't like the person attitude, especially if they know that person is one politicians have centred out for abuse.  Under these rules City staff can intimidate and goad members of the public till they get upset, then staff can say they didn't like the tone of voice they were getting, refuse to deal with them and file a report as a part of the process of denying that person access to City property and services.  Also what could be intimidating to City staff?  A person who asks an intelligent question, that staff don't want to answer.  A person who knows the process and wants a service they should receive.

Next time you try and deal with City staff take some knee pads as if you try and get up off your knees you could be in big trouble!  Staff no longer work for us and if we try to question them we are at risk of committing a violent act.  Mississaugans need to know their place now and who severs who.

This policy gives staff the power to be confrontational with the public, knowing all they need do is to say a few magic words and the taxpayer is the violent criminal.  Yes the door is open to entrapment.  City staff and politicians know human nature, the more you frustrate a person the more they act frustrated, raising of voice, harsher words etc., then accusing the person of a violent act for acting human.  Using human nature as a weapon against people in a predator fashion.  I have call Mississauga politicians predators for some time, now there is no doubt.

Allowing staff the power to act in such an unprofessional fashion also opens door to criminal actions on their part.  The clock is being turned back to the fascism of the 1930's, a time Hazel grew up in and familiar with.  Politicians live in a culture of lies and deceit, they have now expanded it to be the modus operandi for all City staff and on all City property.  Your tax dollars at work, serving politicians interests.

An example of how City of Mississauga staff go after community leaders who don't serve City politicians.

For years I have been a victim of abuse by City staff, that the Mayor, Hazel McCallion, directed staff to do.  It has taken many forms, with holding service, signing false affidavits to deny me my right to service, wrongly interpreting words, policies etc., to deny service and filing false reports.  But the most dangerous and life threatening has come lately with this new policy.  I have lived the past 6 years in poverty to try and empower Mississaugans to be able, to make fully informed decisions (using City records) and to vote on an issue.  Something Hazel says not on your life to.  Hazel warned me that I should fad away but I would not abandon the community that asked me help save the Cawthra Bush.

For years the City did all it could to portray me in a very negative light in order to justify both the local Councillor and Hazel refusing service.  However this framing of Mr. Barber falls apart when it is discovered they also refused to deal with the other persons in our group, they just didn't was to deal with the issue or represent taxpayers.  The Mississauga News (often called the Missing News), prefers to build up Hazel's government and tear down those who question it or seek justice from it.

As I was not being the person they were spending so much time and taxpayers dollars portraying me as and I was not breaking the law enough to take legal action on (the Councillor for Ward 1, Carmen Corbasson, did send the police to my door as she didn't like my attitude), they had to change the law.  So our Mayor directs staff to create a new policy that could be used against any one who dared to stand up for the rights of Canadian to be meaningfully involved in her government.  Hazel McCallion is willing to tear down the very pillars of our society to persecute those who challenge her.  Her hope was that I would not know about this new policy, so it would not be an election issue and to trap me with it.  She was not so lucky.

However, I still lack the money to buy justice in Canada so it is only a matter of time before the new policy turn into a licence to kill for City staff and I will be under the gun by Peel police, Hazel's most willing partners in this anti-democratic crime.

It started to get really hot Sept. 6/2000, a group of us were at the Cawthra Bush to do an interview with Bob Hunter of City TV as the Cawthra Bush had just been declared a Provincially Significant Wetlands Complex.  While we waited, a stranger in a car started to act in an intimidating and very suspicious fashion.  He got out of his car and members of our group asked who he was and if he worked for the City, as he had one of their tee shirts on.  He refused to give his name or say if he was on duty.  I later asked the Mayor in Council and she agrees City staff are to identify themselves when asked by the public, to do so.  He made a effort to try and provoke me into a confrontation by calling out a slanderous remark at me.

Sept. 13 - the same day that "Vandalism and Violence (V&V), in City Facilities" policy is passed I drive into the Cawthra Community Centre, parked well behind the car he used a few days before.  As I go into the Centre he goes out to his car and rips off his tail pipe!  I go out to find out what is going on as he has in the past made it clear he has ill intentions toward me, as do many City staff.  Understand it would be considered by City staff as a career move up to accuse me and best of all lay a charge.  He refuse to answer my questions as to what he was doing. Having good reason to believe he was going to accuse me of damaging his car, I had a look at his name badge so I could at least know who he was.  The next thing I know he is calling the police on me.  Well, five cops show up, complete with a shot gun because this guy says I made him felt intimidated.  He then goes on to say there is a City memo stating staff are not to talk to me, in effect he is blaming his actions on City directions.

Oct. 25 - For the past three years I have gone over to the City staff's haunting of the Cawthra Estate house as apart of a United Way fund raising event, to get petitions signed to help save the Cawthra Bush.  Last year the City staff got nasty and called the police making very slanderous claims against me.  They only took my name.  This year two Peel police officers told me to leave, public property, that members of the public were invited to (and were very supportive of the goal to save the Cawthra Bush from the City), stating they didn't have to give a reason why I had to leave and that it was their decision, not the City's.  How about that, no legal reason.  I feel that I was not arrested out right as two other people were there with me, that the police appeared not to notice at the start.  It is interesting that they approached me and called me by name but took no interest in the other persons collecting signatures.  Clearly I was the target.  The officers refused to involve any member of City staff that were on site in this matter even after being repeatedly being asked to do so.  The City is the land owner and the police felt no need to talk to City staff on site, running the event?  What kind of law enforcement is this?

The real goal of the City is to arrest me for whatever (I am sure her good friends in the Peel police will help her out), it doesn't matter how small the matter is.  Then have their equally good friends in the Mississauga News cover its pages with all kinds of slanderous accusations to drive away any one who has supported me in the past.  With no money of my own and no support from the community, Hazel can look forward to having her way with my life and make me an example to others.

Human life is about the balance between order and chaos.  You have to know where the line is between unacceptable and acceptable losses is.  If you try to eliminate all losses then you have to control everything and everybody.  Then you start to suffer losses from over control and loss of quality of life.  Lets take a lesson from history, the old Soviet Union that destroyed itself from over control and its lack of care of how its government policies affected its citizens.  We hear our Mayor and Councillors remark that this is not Russia, this Canada and in Canada we are free.  (We also hear that politicians are nothing but a bunch of liars and a lie is the opposite of the truth.)  No doubt the City feels, video cameras, computer data bases to have a file on everyone in Mississauga, a call in to report line and all the other technology it has will save it from what has always been the fate of governments that tried to control every little detail.  The cost is in money and lose of the quality human life but that can easily be cover up.  Just keep selling fear and crime control to people.  Make sure the newspapers keep printing crime stories and overlook the fact crime is not going up or that they had to monkey with the statistics to make appear it was.

In the evolution of a country there always comes a time when there is a genuine risk that extreme politicians or those who practice dictatorial or fascist politics will come into power.  That it is up to everyone to stop them before they change the laws so much that it is illegal to protest them.  By that time they will have found a way to control the election process so you can't vote them out.  Politicians can be even more dangerous to a countries survival then the so-called criminal they claim to be protecting us from.  In fact more countries had been destroyed by politicians then a high crime rate.  The first group that fascist politicians will reach out to for support is the police and their guns.  In Toronto the politicians are rightfully offended by the police effort to become a part of the political system.  In Mississauga the deal has are ready been struck and the police are doing the dirty tricks for politicians.  So it is not crime that is out of hand, it is the politicians.

Idea - all persons who are applying to be candidates in election should pass a psychological exams so we know it is safe to let them be a law maker.  And what kind of person they really are.

Canada is not exempt from the human reality.  What goes around comes around, it will happen to us at some time and it appears to be now for Mississaugans!

The V&V policy claims to create a better world where people will not be allowed to do anything that could even sightly offend another.  The political promises of more pie in the sky paradise where you can live free of the fear of crime.  You need only live in fear of being accused of a violent crime.  Maybe of braking wind in some ones direction.  Is this too high a cost for what Mississauga politicians offer (keeping taxes down)?  Is this the world the men and women who fought for our democratic rights and human freedom, died for?  We should honour them and vote out all of Hazel's team, it is the principal that is at stake, after all they have shown their true colors.  Democracy is a contact sport and some people will get upset, that should not be a crime.

Then there is the dehumanizing side to this.  Being told we are not to allowed to express anger or other human emotions, it is unhealthy.  We are human beings for God sake, stop trying to improve us like are some kind of machine or technology that can be just changed by up grading or reprogramming, to be new and improved.  To whatever the standard of the hour is.  Are we not sick of politicians and their committees trying to see how many hoops they make us jump through?  They feel so justified in trying to change our behaviour to suite them and what makes life easier for them, as they claim to be experts and we are not.  I say if they are so bloody smart why can't they learn to communicate with us, on our terms?  Why is it we have to learn to speak their language?  Why is it they can't tell the truth and that is accepted as normal but if we should be a little off in the facts it is a big crime?

The late Pierre Elliott Trudeau said "Canada is not immoral", yes, it can be destroyed by politicians.

Last word;
If you note to politicians that you disagree with the City's V&V policy it is likely they will say write your concerns out and you should.  I would like a copy as what is sent to the City. all to often disappears.  Don't let City hall or its politicians fool you into believing that writing in, with your concerns, will be enough.  Don't vote for them because of V&V and tell them so.

Most of all don't believe them if they say or suggest Council will review this policy after the election and vote for them any ways.  They are just fooling you!

Your Financial Donations are Greatly Appreciated
and Very Much Needed to Ensure the Survival of

Donald Barber Defense Fund
Needs help right now
Now Accepting Pay Pal.

• Home Page • Main Table of Contents •

Back to Top

• About This Web-Site & Contact Info •