• Home • Table of Contents • General News •

YouTube  site
where my videos are posted

Pages  of  Special  Interest;

In Defence of Canadians Rights & Democracy

* Hazel McCallion - Mayor of Mississauga *
- 2009 -
* Conflict of Interest & Judicial Inquiry *

* Public Question Period Index *
!! A Mississauga Democratic Tradition Lost !!

• Defense Fund for Donald Barber •

• Sound Clip Gallery • Video Clip Gallery •

• Byron Osmond Pleas for Mercy • Peel police Wrong Doings •

• Hazel McCallion - Mayor of Mississauga - her Misdeeds • The Culham Brief •

• Order of Canada & its Corruption •

• End of Suburbia & Continuous Communities as the Solution - JOBS FOR LIFE •

Other  Table  of  Contents;
• Events • Archive of Links •
• Media - News Articles & Letters to Media • Literature & News Letters •

• Elections Results in Mississauga • Political History of Mississauga • Political, Democratic & Legal Issues •

• Political Methods • The Meaning of Words & Phrases • Political Satire & Parody •
• City Mississauga Committees • City Mississauga By-Laws & Policies •
• Security Insanity • Police Issues, Complaints & News Articles •
• FOI - Freedom of Information Results & Issues •
• Legal Issues • Unions Issues •

• Political Players & Persons of Interest • Ratepayers Groups & their Issues in Mississauga •

Scanned, recopied or Internet copy, if there are errors, please e-mail me with corrections:

Opening comments:  More at the end.

To the Public Question Period Index page.

Mississauga News - Aug 28, 2009 - Letter of the Week by Andrew Hamilton-Smith, Mississauga South NDP

Letter of the week
Public Question Period, Questions

Dear Editor:

This letter was sent to Mayor Hazel McCallion and councillors.  A copy was filed with The News for publication.

When asked about the directive issued by Council July 8, deputy City clerk Grant Bivol cited the need for efficiency and the fact that certain individuals were “grandstanding” at televised meetings.  While it’s understandable that Council needs to maintain decorum and stay on topic during sessions, the actions of one or two individuals cannot possibly justify the extreme measure of completely removing the tradition of Public Question Period (PQP) from council meetings.

The objective should be to refine the quality of questions asked at council, not eliminate them altogether.  Rather than redirecting debate to another level (i.e. committees), these changes will actually serve to undermine it.

Citizens are already free to attend committee meetings under the current system.  Meanwhile, little evidence exists that public questions are handled more effectively through committees.  The ultimate effect is simply to herd more citizens into fewer avenues of recourse.

The 15-minute time limit for all public questions at the end of each committee meeting will hardly address this reduction of opportunities for public discussion.  Worse still, this brief time includes the time required for responses.  It’s conceivable that only one question could be asked and one answered within that period.

Do these changes represent a genuine attempt by Council to streamline public inquiry?

By referring all questions to City staff and committees, Council is restricting the ability of citizens to communicate with their elected representatives or hold them accountable.

Home Page   -  Main Table of  Contents  -  Back up a page  -   Back to Top


Your Financial Donations are Greatly Appreciated
and Very Much Needed to Ensure the Survival of

Donald Barber Defense Fund
Needs help right now
Now Accepting Pay Pal.

• Home Page • Main Table of Contents •

Back to Top

• About This Web-Site & Contact Info •