THE  DEMOCRATIC  REPORTER


• Home • Table of Contents • General News •


YouTube  site
where my videos are posted


Pages  of  Special  Interest;

In Defence of Canadians Rights & Democracy


* Hazel McCallion - Mayor of Mississauga *
- 2009 -
* Conflict of Interest & Judicial Inquiry *


* Public Question Period Index *
!! A Mississauga Democratic Tradition Lost !!


• Defense Fund for Donald Barber •

• Sound Clip Gallery • Video Clip Gallery •

• Byron Osmond Pleas for Mercy • Peel police Wrong Doings •

• Hazel McCallion - Mayor of Mississauga - her Misdeeds • The Culham Brief •

• Order of Canada & its Corruption •

• End of Suburbia & Continuous Communities as the Solution - JOBS FOR LIFE •


Other  Table  of  Contents;
• Events • Archive of Links •
• Media - News Articles & Letters to Media • Literature & News Letters •

• Elections Results in Mississauga • Political History of Mississauga • Political, Democratic & Legal Issues •

• Political Methods • The Meaning of Words & Phrases • Political Satire & Parody •
• City Mississauga Committees • City Mississauga By-Laws & Policies •
• Security Insanity • Police Issues, Complaints & News Articles •
• FOI - Freedom of Information Results & Issues •
• Legal Issues • Unions Issues •

• Political Players & Persons of Interest • Ratepayers Groups & their Issues in Mississauga •



Scanned, recopied or Internet copy, if there are errors, please e-mail me with corrections:


Opening comments:  More at the end.
 


Toronto Star - Aug 13, 2007, By Tracey Tyler, LEGAL AFFAIRS REPORTER

Let judges run courts, lawyers say
Resolution urges governments to turn over control of court operation to judiciary to ensure autonomy

CALGARY To some, having prosecutors running the court system is the precarious legal equivalent of leaving a fox in charge of a chicken coop.  Yet in many provinces, including Ontario, that's reality, with attorneys general not just prosecuting people for crimes, but operating the court themselves.

But Canada's largest legal organization wants to cut those bureaucratic strings and turn control of court operations over to the judiciary.  At its annual meeting here over the weekend, the Canadian Bar Association endorsed a resolution urging provincial and territorial governments to shift from government to judge-based control of court administration, calling it crucial to ensuring the independence of the judiciary.

"What we have is a situation where judges are often not masters of their own houses," said outgoing bar association president Parker MacCarthy, who brought forward the resolution.

There are practical and principled reasons for ending government control of the courts and the public will be the biggest beneficiary, he said in an interview.

While judges often know best what's needed to keep courts running smoothly, they're typically beholden to the whims of bureaucrats when it comes to deciding whether and how court budgets will be spent.  This includes everything from hiring staff to rooms for juries.
 But even more important is the potential for conflict of interest when the government, which regularly appears in court as a litigant, is also controlling the working conditions of the bench, he said.

Concerns about the government administering court operations were raised as long as 30 years ago, including by former Ontario attorney general Roy McMurtry.  A report prepared for the Canadian Judicial Council last year said court administrators are often torn between loyalty to the government and loyalty to the judges they serve.

Complicating the situation further, the report said, is the tension that's developed in recent years between the judiciary and some provincial governments over their failures to follow the recommendations of judicial remuneration commissions and raise judges' salaries.

The report's authors, including Toronto law professors and court administration experts Carl Baar, Robert Hann and Lorne Sossin, recommended a "limited autonomy" model for court operations.

Their system would see governments setting court budgets, judges deciding how to spend the money and an independent commission set up to mediate disputes.

In other developments over the weekend, the bar association also approved a resolution calling on the federal government to scrap the GST on legal services to reduce the high cost of litigation and improve access to the justice system.

The resolution calls for legal services to be "zero rated" for the GST, not GST-exempt like groceries, said Toronto lawyer Allan Gelkopf, who chairs the association's commodity tax, customs and trade section.

While the net effect is the same for consumers they would pay no GST on legal bills it's an important difference for lawyers because zero-rating the GST entitles them to claim tax credits on goods and services purchased for running their law offices, he said.

However, members of the bar association who were hoping to ask Justice Minister Rob Nicholson today will no longer have that opportunity. Although Nicholson was scheduled to give a speech and take questions from lawyers part of a long-standing conference tradition he's been told by Prime Minister Stephen Harper he must remain in Ottawa, MacCarthy said yesterday during the conference's official opening ceremonies.

Harper is expected to shuffle his cabinet in the coming days.  "I guess if your boss is the Prime Minister, you have to listen pretty carefully to those requests," MacCarthy said. Nicholson delivered a brief, pre-recorded speech yesterday by video.


  Home Page   -  Main Table of  Contents  -  Back up a page  -   Back to Top


[COMMENTS BY DON B. -  ]



Your Financial Donations are Greatly Appreciated
and Very Much Needed to Ensure the Survival of
THE  DEMOCRATIC  REPORTER


The
Donald Barber Defense Fund
Needs help right now
&
Now Accepting Pay Pal.


• Home Page • Main Table of Contents •

Back to Top

• About This Web-Site & Contact Info •