Scanned, recopied or Internet copy, if there are errors, please e-mail me with corrections: Opening comments: More at the end. Makes you wonder how Peter McCallion can claim to be so poor, needing taxpayers money for lawyer in this Inquiry. To the main Judicial Inquiry page - to the Hazel McCallion page. Mississauga News - July 13, 2010 - By Mississauga News. Company received $4M pay-out over hotel deal A development firm represented by Mayor McCallion's son received a $4 million pay-out after a deal to build a hotel in the city centre fell through, The National Post is reporting. Comments by others - 10 - to this web-page at time of posting; pacroust Jul 13, 2010 1:06 PM @ConcernedResident So now we've gone from "show me evidence that he got a payout" to "show me it wasn't a reasonable amount". Those straws keep getting smaller and smaller, don't they? * Agree 1 The Mississauga Muse Jul 13, 2010 12:53 PM Urbaniak? Where? And funny how when I quoted Urbaniak he was swept away and I was accused of shilling for his book! :-) * Agree 1 The Mississauga Muse Jul 13, 2010 12:52 PM $4 million payout for $14.4 million property. 28%. Is 28% value of land regular payouts for deals falling through? * Agree 1 The Mississauga Muse Jul 13, 2010 12:49 PM Tony, Tony, Tony... You FORGET! This isn't just any municipality! What would scuttle the careers of most Canadian mayors DOES NOT APPLY TO MYTHISSAUGA! * Agree 1 Tony Jackson Jul 13, 2010 10:42 AM 4 Millions, Where's the rest of the payout? Hundreds of millions worth 'city's utility business' has given out to OMERS with full control (through an under-the-table veto). At least 10% should have paid as bribe. Is it the McCallion son-mother duo, the cheapest in Canada to bribe? * Agree 1 ConcernedResident Jul 13, 2010 10:37 AM The Game Ain't Over Also quoted in the article - "Tom Urbaniak, an academic with expertise in Mississauga politics, says it is too early to determine whether $4-million was a reasonable settlement amount. “It depends in part on whether the purchase-and-sale agreement was properly terminated by the vendors,” he noted. “We are hearing somewhat different versions of that crucial event.” Interesting that none of you wannabe thespians mentioned this part of the article. * Agree 1 ConcernedResident Jul 13, 2010 10:16 AM @crotch Contributing your IQ again, eh? * Agree pacroust Jul 13, 2010 9:39 AM @Mantis Yoohoo! Over here, sweetie! * Agree 2 ComeOn Jul 13, 2010 9:16 AM Hazel McCallion Scandal Grows! Now we know the amount of the secret agreement. I am sure the Hazel supporters are hiding. Afterall she sold them a bill of goods when she kept silent and let them believe she had done nothing wrong. Where is the media to demand that Hazel appologize to the residents and the other members of Council? The media keeps on trucking out the conflict of interest stuff when we are looking at a much more serious picture and many more serious terms could easily apply here. Shame on you Hazel! * Agree 8 Stephen Wahl Jul 13, 2010 9:00 AM Now THAT’S offensive Owes back taxes, man of modest means, unfairly made the centre of the Inquiry. How many other true citizens of Mississauga feel like chumps now? * Agree 7 Home Page - Main Table of Contents - Back up a page - Back to Top [COMMENTS BY DON B. - ] |
Your Financial Donations are Greatly Appreciated The • |